Analog Knobs vs. Digital Buttons
In the mid-20th century, jazz, abstract expressionism, open form poetry, were some of the art forms that celebrated a kind of escape from regimentation and expectation. An interest in process arose, and for some, the journey became more important than the destination. HPR’s Noe Tanigawa reports a revival of that spirit is underway, for example, in an exhibition at UH M?noa.
This Wednesday around 2pm, skateboarders take on Peter Chamberlain’s interactive room. Friday 2 to 4pm everyone’s invited to participate in the closing non-extravaganza.
Peter Chamberlain, Professor of intermedia and electronic arts started as a goldsmith, became a sculptor and electronic musician who eventually combined things with performance and sound sculpture, into installations and videos. I asked how these things affect people?
“Some people, it drives them totally nuts, especially if you get motion sickness or something. I haven’t met anyone in here that’s in epileptic type danger.”
The room’s pretty dark and vivid shapes are morphing and twisting on one wall. There are no buttons!!!! This is a totally analog production. Several consoles bristling with knobs and dials control the audio effects. Forget digital and wireless, and love the looping cords and wires.
“Art happens when it’s happening period. When you’re painting that’s art. When your painting’s done it’s not art anymore, it’s surplus, it’s leftovers. Just throw it away, make another one, right? when you’re watching this, it’s live, this is real time, you’re witnessing real art.”
Chamberlain is playing with randomness, open endedness,
“But very structured. It’s open ended structures. This is a very structured thing, but it’s open ended. It can change.”
It’s not designed to a T then executed, the process is programmed to a point, then indeterminate. Chamberlain worked with 20th century composer John Cage, who captured the rule trashing experimentation of the time.
“ This is a little piece of uranium 238 in a Geiger counter. If I turn it up it’s sampling a hundred percent of the notes, here, it’s maybe 30% or something. Then from there it’s being patchedinto other systems that are changing it, so that’s where you get the versatility from, it’s going into this, out of that. You can see it’s also altering the video. I can control things by turning knobs but it’s also controlled by the voltage changes. It’s a voltage controlled system. This is what Robert Moog set up in the ‘60’s.”
With several ironic twists like the tchotchke-esque perpetual motion birds Chamberlain painted to look like political candidates.
“Given it’s the election season, I decided they’re my drunken politicians. The systems I’ve been setting up have been being made maybe ten years but in the last five years have become very popular. And because of the ways things patch in and out, possibilities are pretty infinite.”
I asked if Professor Chamberlain had ever produced anything actually pleasurable to listen to. Laughing, he said, “I find this pleasurable. You’ll go to the beach and you will listen to the waves. You’ll close your eyes and whhooosh, swiiiiisshhh.”
Earlier this year Chamberlain was invited to perform and present in Portland and he made over 200 aluminum hats for attendees—as protection from cosmic rays? Let’s face it, uranium ions are powering a roomful of sounds and images, maybe we should be worried about all the cell phone signals and everything else running through and around us. Chamberlain will have a skateboard ramp in the gallery Wednesday, with skaters to generate the sounds and images. Everyone’s invited to participate in the finale Friday, September 16, from 2 to 4pm.
After 25 years teaching and working in expanded arts and media, Peter Chamberlain finds himself being drawn back to early experiments with analog systems. He says there’s been a resurgence of interest in analog audio/visual systems because of the flexibility and variation that’s possible, also, cost and durability issues. His exhibit, “Aesthetic Surplus Kompany Presents:” may look wild, but it’s rooted in a natural process.
David Goldberg, Project Coordinator, Digital Arts and Humanities Initiative at UH M?noa contributes these comments as context for Chamberlain's work:
the short of it is that what peter is doing has “come full circle.”
we have partially exited a period of digital predictability when it comes to using tools like photoshop, and returned to a space of feedback loops and evolving outcomes… much closer to the real world that is not made out of individual pixels.
in the larger context, the whole social media system of following and liking surrounds us with the kinds of feedback loops that peter is creating in a local space.
there is a significant movement in audio circles that works with the analog modules and nests of cables that you saw in peter’s installation. there is a good deal of craftsmanship, unique solutions, and artisanship in the design, manufacture and selling of these components. on one hand it’s hipster elitism, but for many folks its also about creating sounds that are not baked into your sampler or digital editing program.
his use of the theremin also represents a passing shout-out to a more nostalgic period of electronic music – but notably, peter doesn’t use them to generate musical sounds, but to generate voltage changes that affect the video processing…. videos that, i might add, are not “self-portraits” but are nevertheless produced in reaction to your motions and gestures… his system is a “portrait of you” but not in the nihilistic or self-centered way that people have grown used to with their video games and instagram accounts.